CLABOX. Audiological Evaluation Tool for Remote Assessment of Cochlear Implants

Masiero, B. M. Campinas State University, Campinas (São Paulo), Brazil, masiero@unicamp.br

Borges, L. R. Pontificial Catholic University, Campinas (São Paulo), Brazil

Cagnacci, B. Cochlear Latin America, São Paulo (São Paulo), Brazil

Caldas, F. F. Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Brasilia, Brasília, (Federal District), Brazil

Takeuti, A. A. Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Brasilia, Brasília, (Federal District), Brazil

Bahmad, F. Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Brasilia, Brasília, (Federal District), Brazil

Abstract

Cochlear implants (CI) are now widely accepted as an effective treatment for profound deafness. Several commercial devices are currently available and technological resources are constantly updated. However, we still face difficulties in the standardization of evaluation of CI users, such as large variation in the acoustics of test environments, use of different types of speech recognition materials, inconsistent use of noise in speech tests, and absence of normality criteria. The CLABOX was developed in an attempt to standardize audiological tests and allow comparisons between cochlear implant user outcomes among centers and countries in Latin-America. The CLABOX is an audiological evaluation tool written in Matlab designed to provide a direct connection between the computer and the cochlear implant via a commercial audio interface (Presonus AudioBox iOne). This feature allows an evaluation condition independent of local acoustic conditions or the availability of good sound stimuli, as the CI external microphone can be turned off during tests and all audio files used for testing are pre-recorded. CLABOX offers the following sound stimuli: (1) pure tones to verify the CI calibration; (2) Ling sounds, which are language independent and can be used to evaluate detection and identification in both adults and children; and (3) sentences with or without additive noise to mimic HINT conditions (fixed or adaptive), which can be used to evaluate speech recognition skills. The CLABOX environment was compared to measurements in a sound booth. Fifty individuals with cochlear implants (CIs), 33 adults and 17 children, were included. For speech recognition in noise, averages were better in the CLABOX; for pure tone threshold, they were higher in the CLABOX; and for Ling sounds, there was no significant change in the categories between sound booth and CLABOX, suggesting that the CLABOX is an effective tool to assess pure tone and speech recognition tests.

Keywords:

cochlear implant

remote assessment

audiometry

speech recognition.

References

[1] F. de Graaff, E. Huysmans, O. U. Qazi, F. J. Van poucke, P. Merkus, S. T. Goverts, and C. Smits. The Development of Remote Speech Recognition Tests for Adult Cochlear Implant Users: The Effect of Presentation Mode of the Noise and a Reliable Method to Deliver Sound in Home Environments. Au diology and Neurotology, 21 Suppl 1:48–54, 2016. doi:10.1159/000448355.

[2] M. M. C. Pinheiro, P. C. Mancini, A. D. Soares, Â. Ribas, D. P. Lima, M. Cavadas, M. R. Banhara, S. A. D. S. Carvalho, and B. C. Buzo. Comparison of Speech Recognition in Cochlear Implant Users with Different Speech Processors. Journal of the Ameri can Academy of Audiology, 32(7):469–476, 07 2021. doi:10.1055/s-0041-1735252.

[3] J. L. Goehring, M. L. Hughes, J. L. Baudhuin, D. L. Valente, R. W. McCreery, G. R. Diaz, T. Sanford, and R. Harpster. The effect of technology and testing environment on speech perception using telehealth with cochlear implant recipients. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 55(5):1373 1386, Oct 2012. doi:https://doi.org/10.1044/1092 4388(2012/11-0358).

[4] M. L. Hughes, J. L. Goehring, J. L. Baudhuin, G. R. Diaz, T. Sanford, R. Harpster, and D. L. Va lente. Use of telehealth for research and clinical mea sures in cochlear implant recipients: a validation study. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 55(4):1112–1127, Aug 2012. doi:10.1044/1092 4388(2011/11-0237).

[5] Daniel Ling. Speech and the Hearing-Impaired Child: Theory and Practice. The Alexander Graham Bell As sociation for the Deaf, 1978. ISBN 978-0882000749.

[6] Robert Humphrey. Playrec. Multi-channel Matlab Audio. URL https://github.com/PlayrecForMatlab. Accessed: 2022-06-19.

[7] J. D. Sevier, S. Choi, and M. L. Hughes. Use of Direct-Connect for Remote Speech-Perception Test ing in CochlearImplants. EarHear, 40(5):1162–1173, 2019. doi:10.1097/AUD.0000000000000693.

[8] D Swanepoel and J L Clark. Hearing healthcare in re mote or resource-constrained environments. The Jour nal of Laryngology & Otology, 133(1):11–17, 2019. doi:10.1017/S0022215118001159.

[9] Timo Bräcker, Jane Opie, Peter Nopp, and Ilona Anderson. Introducing real-life listening features into the clinical test environment: Part i: Mea suring the hearing performance and evaluating the listening effort of individuals with normal hear ing. Cochlear Implants International, 20(3):138–146, 2019. doi:10.1080/14670100.2019.1573953.