Comparison of experimental transmission loss of expansion chambers models with extended ducts and microperforated panel

Comparison of experimental transmission loss of expansion chambers models with extended ducts and microperforated panel

Borges, M. R. S. Universidade de Brasília, Brasília, DF, Brasil, borgesmaria9421@gmail.com
Nunes, M. A. A. Universidade de Brasília, Brasília, DF, Brasil, maanunes@unb.br

Abstract

The use of microperforated panels in mufflers has presented as one of the ways to increase sound absorption properties and replace the use of fibrous materials in some applications. In expansion chamber mufflers, the combination of MPP with other geometrical changes, such as extensions of the inlet/outlet ducts, can provide different amplitudes of transmission loss, mainly in low-frequency bands. To demonstrate this performance four models of expansion chamber mufflers with microperforated panels have been proposed to operate in frequency ranges from 250 to 350Hz. These models combine the MPP position and the geometrical changes: an outlet extend duct inserted in the main chamber, internal partitions added to the MPP air cavity depth, and simultaneous inlet/outlet extend ducts. The acoustic performance of these mufflers was compared using the experimental TL via the Two Load Method (TLM). To validate the experimental results test bench was constructed and validated by the analytical method Transfer Matrix Method (TMM) and via the Finite Element Method (FEM) in the ANSYS software. In all models, the models presented TL with good performance in low and medium frequency ranges. The comparisons show that the addition of duct extensions at the inlet/outlet of the muffler was the principal influence on different TL amplitudes, indicating that the combination between the MPP and simultaneous extend ducts inside the chamber has a great potential for improving the TL of these mufflers, essentially to act at low frequencies.

Keywords:  
noise control
,
mufflers
,
microperforated panel
,
transmission loss.

References

[1] A. Selamet and Z. L. Ji. Acoustic attenuation performance of circular expansion chambers with extended inlet/outlet. Journal of Sound and Vi bration, 223(2):197–212, 1999. ISSN 0022460X. doi:10.1006/jsvi.1998.2138.
[2] Xiang Yu and Li Cheng. Duct noise atten uation using reactive silencer with various inter nal configurations. Journal of Sound and Vibra tion, 335:229–244, jan 2015. ISSN 10958568. doi:10.1016/j.jsv.2014.08.035. URL http://dx.d oi.org/10.1016/j.jsv.2014.08.035https://linkinghub .elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0022460X1400707X.
[3] Z.L. Ji. Acoustic attenuation characteristics of straight-throuhj perforated tube silencers and res onators. Journal of Computational Acoustics, 16(03):361–379, sep 2008. ISSN 0218-396X. doi:10.1142/S0218396X08003622. URL https: //www.worldscientific.com/doi/abs/10.1142/S 0218396X08003622.
[4] Dah-You Maa. Potential of microperforated panel absorber. Journal of Acoustic Society America, 104 (4):2861–2866, 1998. ISSN 1050-2947. URL https: //link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevA.65.044304.
[5] S. Allam and M. Åbom. A new type of muffler based on microperforated tubes. Journal of Vibra tion and Acoustics, Transactions of the ASME, 133 (3):31005–1–31005–8, jun 2011. ISSN 15288927. doi:10.1115/1.4002956. URL 10.1115/1.4002956.
[6] Jinghao Liu, D W Herrin, and A F Seybert. Applica tion of Micro-Perforated Panels to Attenuate Noise in a Duct. In SAE Technical Paper Series, number 724, may 2007. doi:10.4271/2007-01-2196. URL https://www.sae.org/content/2007-01-2196/.
[7] D.P. Jena and S.N. Panigrahi. Estimat ing acoustic transmission loss of perforated fil ters using finite element method. Measure ment, 73:1–14, sep 2015. ISSN 02632241. doi:10.1016/j.measurement.2015.05.008. URL http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.measurement.2015.05.008https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S026322 4115002572.
[8] Z. Tao and A. F. Seybert. A Review of Current Tech niques for Measuring Muffler Transmission Loss. In SAE Technical Paper Series, volume 1, may 2003. ISBN 9780470688755. doi:10.4271/2003-01-1653. URLhttps://www.sae.org/content/2003-01-1653/.
[9] ASTM. ASTM-E2611-17: Standard Test Method for Normal Incidence Determination of Porous Ma terial Acoustical Properties Based on the Transfer Matrix Method, 2017.
[10] Gabriela Cristina Cândido; Silva, Maria Alzira de Araújo Nunes, Renato Vilela Lopes, and Anto nio Boson Almeida Jr. Design and Construction of a LowCostImpedance Tube forSoundAbsorption Co efficients Measurements. (Cobem 2013):105–115, 2013.
Publicado em:
01/09/2022