Implementation and evaluation of a fast method for THD analysis of sound transducers under demanding operating conditions

Brum, R. Vibration and Acoustics Laboratory, Federal University of Santa Catarina, Florianópolis, SC, Brazil.
Paul, S. Vibration and Acoustics Laboratory, Federal University of Santa Catarina, Florianópolis, SC, Brazil.

Abstract

The total harmonic distortion (THD) is an important parameter to specify an instrument performance. In general, this parameter is specified in a single frequency and as the maximum level allowed in the operational range of the device under test (DUT). Müller (2007) formulated the sweep level method for fast THD evaluation, in which THD vs. level is obtained using a single tone modulated by a sweep level envelope. Thus, is possible to evaluate the THD in the function of carrier frequency and also of the input level of the system. Moreover, the relationship between the input and output levels can be used to analyze the non-linear behavior of the DUT. The method was validated using both numerical and experimental comparison with the classical stepped sine method. In the numerical model, a hyperbolic tangent was applied to the excitation signal to simulate non-linear behavior. The most important conclusion obtained refers to the level parametrization that was made in an increment of the signal amplitude per wave cycle, instead of increment per time unit. Using an increment of 0,05 dB per wave cycle, the maximum error between sweep level and stepped sine was less than 0,01%. Using a loudspeaker and microphone, the THD of the system was tested in the frequency range between 125 Hz and 4 kHz. The results for the maximum THD vs level presented strong frequency dependence. Thus, the linear operational range of electroacoustical transducers is frequency dependent and it is important to specify for high fidelity applications, mainly if loud signals must be reproduced by the system. As the next step, it is intended to purpose a standardization of THD measurement and results presentation. So, is possible to offers a more detailed parameters to the customers.

Keywords:  
harmonic distortion
,
electroacoustic measurement
,
non-linearity.

References

[1] Alan Oppenheim and A. Simon Willsky. Sinais e Sistemas. Pearson, São Paulo, 2 edition, 2010. ISBN 978-8576055044.
[2] Swen Müller and Zemar Soares. Caracterização de microfones de medição. 11a Convenção Nacional da AES Brasil, São Paulo, 2013.
[3] Udo Zölzer. Dafx. Wiley-Blackwell, Hoboken, NJ, 2 edition, March 2011.
[4] Ricardo Brum. Estudo da influência de diferentes técnicas de auralização na avaliação da qualidade sonora de produtos, 2020. URL https://repositorio. ufsc.br/handle/123456789/220398.
[5] Bruno de Araújo Fujita and Stephan Paul. Comparação da impedância elétrica entre doze altofalantes novos e após uso ininterrupto. 01 2018. doi:10.17648/sobrac-87136.
[6] Swen Müller and Nelson Melo do Espírito Santo. Fast distortion vs. level measurements with smoothly increasing signal amplitudes. 11a Convenção Nacional da AES Brasil, São Paulo, 2007.
[7] Lúcia Silva. Caracterização de microfones mems analógicos. trabalho de conclusão de curso. 07 2018. doi:10.13140/RG.2.2.25995.64808.
[8] Iaroslav V Blagouchine and Eric Moreau. Analytic method for the computation of the total harmonic distortion by the cauchy method of residues. IEEE Transactions on communications, 59(9):2478–2491, 2011.
[9] Swen Müller and Paulo Massarani. Transferfunction measurement with sweeps. Journal of the Audio Engineering Society, 49(6):443–471, 2001. ISSN 1549-4950. URL http://www.aes.org/elib/ browse.cfm?elib=10189.
[10] William D’Andrea Fonseca, João Vitor Paes, Matheus Lazarin, Marcos Vinicius Reis, Paulo Mareze, and Eric Brandão. PyTTa: Open Source Toolbox for Acoustic Measurements and Signal Processing. Universitätsbibliothek der RWTH Aachen, 2019.
Publicado em:
01/09/2022