A proposal of criteria for evaluating music as an urban soundscape element

A proposal of criteria for evaluating music as an urban soundscape element

Sampaio, L. Y M. Programa de Pós-Graduação em Arquitetura, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brasil, lucas.sampaio@fau.ufrj.br

Abstract

In urban soundscape studies, music frequently appears as a prominent sonority amidst multiple sonic stimuli perceived by individuals and collectives. In the contemporary city, music emerges from either acoustic or electroacoustic sources, of human or non-human origin, assuming different motifs in an almost ubiquitous disposition in the urban landscape. However, it is noticed that a frequent generalization of musical objects occurs when characterizing their insertion in the soundscape, as opposed to the possible cultural specificities and relationships with the listeners. On the other hand, musical elements produce different reactions in space, promoting attraction, integration, and separation, as a result of users' emotional reactions, cultures, and identities. Thus, to widen this discussion, it is necessary to extend urban soundscape research to fields such as musicology and cultural studies, delving into the reasons why determined musical elements induce different reactions in the city's ears. The main objective of the present research is to investigate the relationship between music and landscape, proposing and structuring criteria to evaluate the role of musical elements in the experience of different urban actors. As the basis for defining the respective criteria, a tripartite semiotic approach was chosen, which proposes the simultaneous analysis of the musical object in its materiality, the poietic process of actors involved in the musical (re)production, and the listener's esthesic process. This tripartite model is linked with a fourth layer, correlating the previous criteria with factors from the acoustic environment and landscape, thus inserting the musical element in the urban context. At this stage, the present work aims at exhibiting a general structure of the criteria, creating a discussion between the semiotic approach, the factors of influence, and the considered theoretical framework.

Keywords:  
soundscape
,
music
,
semiology
,
landscape
,
urbanism.

References

[1] Michael Frank Southworth. The sonic environment of cities. PhD thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Tech nology, 1967.
[2] R Murray Schafer. The Soundscape: Our Sonic Environment and the Tuning of the World. 1977.
[3] Jian Kang and Brigitte Schulte-Fortkamp. Sound scape and the built environment, volume 525. CRC press Boca Raton, FL, USA:, 2016.
[4] Hildegard Westerkamp. Linking soundscape compo sition and acoustic ecology. Organised Sound, 7(1): 51–56, 2002.
[5] Barry Truax. Soundscape composition as global mu sic: Electroacoustic music as soundscape. Organised Sound, 13(2):103–109, 2008.
[6] ISO 12913:2014. Acoustics — Soundscape — Part 1: Definition and conceptual framework. Stan dard, International Organization for Standardization, Geneva, CH, September 2014.
[7] Welsh Government. Noise and soundscape action plan 2018-2023. 2018.
[8] Barry Truax. Handbook for acoustic ecology. Cam bridge Street Publishing, 1999.
[9] Josh McDermott. The evolution of music. Nature, 453(7193):287–288, 2008.
[10] ALBrown, Jian Kang, and Truls Gjestland. Towards standardization in soundscape preference assessment. Applied acoustics, 72(6):387–392, 2011.
[11] Kang Sun, Bert De Coensel, Karlo Filipan, Francesco Aletta, Timothy Van Renterghem, Toon De Pessemier, Wout Joseph, and Dick Botteldooren. Classification of soundscapes of urban public open spaces. Landscape and urban planning, 189:139 155, 2019.
[12] Philip Tagg. Analysing popular music: theory, method and practice. Popular music, 2:37–67, 1982.
[13] Christopher Small. Musicking: The meanings of performing andlistening. Wesleyan University Press, 1998.
[14] Jean-Jacques Nattiez. Music and discourse: Toward a semiology of music. Princeton University Press, 1990.
[15] Kevin Lynch. The image of the city. MIT press, 1964.
[16] William Hollingsworth Whyte et al. The social life of small urban spaces. 1980.
[17] José Manuel Ressano Garcia Lamas and Universi dade Técnica de Lisboa. Morfologia urbana e de senho da cidade. 1993.
[18] Christoph Cox and Daniel Warner. Audio Cul ture, Revised Edition: Readings in Modern Music. Bloomsbury Publishing USA, 2017.
[19] Bruno Nettl. The study of ethnomusicology: Thirty one issues and concepts. University of Illinois Press, 2010.
[20] Georgina Born. Music, sound and space: Transfor mations ofpublic andprivate experience. Cambridge University Press, 2013.
[21] Jean Jacques Nattiez. O modelo tripartite de semi ologia musical: o exemplo de la cathédrale engloutie, de debussy. DEBATES-Cadernos do Programa de Pós-Graduação em Música, (6), 2002.
[22] Jean Molino, JA Underwood, andCraig Ayrey. Musi cal fact and the semiology of music. Music analysis, 9(2):105–156, 1990.
[23] Paulo Afonso Rheingantz, GAN Azevedo, A Brasileiro, D Alcantara, and Mônica Queiroz. Observando a qualidade do lugar: procedimentos para a avaliação pós-ocupação. PROARQ/UFRJ, 2009.
[24] Papatya Nur Dokmeci Yorukoglu and Ayse Zeynep Ustun Onur. Semiotic interpretation of a city soundscape. Semiotica, 2019(226):73–87, 2019.
[25] Jian Kang and Mei Zhang. Semantic differential analysis of the soundscape in urban open public spaces. Building and environment, 45(1):150–157, 2010.
[26] Frederik Laigaard Nielbo. From soundscape to meaningscape. Proceedings of the EuroNoise, Edin burgh, 2015
[27] Stuart Hall et al. Cultural identity and diaspora. 1990, pages 222–237, 1990.
[28] Alan P Merriam and Valerie Merriam. The anthro pology of music. Northwestern University Press, 1964.
[29] Júlia Maria Hummes. Por que é importante o en sino de música? considerações sobre as funções da música na sociedade e na escola. Revista da ABEM, 12(11), 2004.
[30] Juhani Pallasmaa. Os olhos da pele: a arquitetura e os sentidos. Artmed Editora, 2009.
[31] Yi-Fu Tuan. Espaço e lugar:: A perspectiva da experiência. SciELO-EDUEL, 2013.
[32] Charles Seeger. Prescriptive and descriptive music writing. The Musical Quarterly, 44(2):184–195, 1958.
[33] Daniel Chandler. An introduction to genre theory. 1997.
[34] Philip Tagg. Analysing popular music: theory, method, and practice. Reading pop: Approaches to textual analysis in popular music, 1982:71, 2000.
[35] Nicholas Cook. A guide to musical analysis. Oxford University Press, USA, 1994.
[36] Philip Tagg. Análise musical para" não-musos": a percepção popular como base para a compreensão de estruturas e significados. Per Musi, pages 7–18, 2011.
[37] Georgina Born. On musical mediation: Ontology, technology and creativity. Twentieth-century music, 2(1):7–36, 2005.
[38] Michel Chion. Sound: an acoulogical treatise. Duke University Press, 2015.
[39] Claudia Maria de Holanda Rocha. Escutando a cidade: Cartografia de Sonoridades. PhD the sis, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, 2017.
[40] Pierre Schaeffer. Traité des objets musicaux. 1966.
[41] Kai Tuuri and Tuomas Eerola. Formulating a revised taxonomy for modes of listening. Journal of new music research, 41(2):137–152, 2012.
[42] Barry Truax. Acoustic communication. Greenwood Publishing Group, 2001.
Publicado em:
01/09/2022